The Director Identification Number (DIN) is a unique number assigned by the Central Government to individuals who aspire to become or are already serving as directors of a corporation. A DIN is mandatory for all company directors. Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers the Registrar of Companies (ROCs) to disqualify directors by rejecting their DIN. This article focuses on disqualified directors under Section 164(2).
Table of Content
When a director is disqualified by the ROC (Registrar of Companies), they are prohibited from serving as a director of any company for the duration of the disqualification. The Act’s Section 164(2) has a broad scope regarding the disqualification of directors. If a corporation where a director holds directorship commits a default, it subjects the director to disqualification.
Let’s have a look at “What is Section 164(2), before understanding about the Disqualification of Directors u/s 164(2).
According to Section 164(2), a director is ineligible to be re-appointed as a director of a business or to be appointed as a director of another company for five years after the company of the director fails to comply with the following:
Under section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, a company’s failure to file financial statements or annual returns for three consecutive years empowers the Registrar of Companies (ROC) to disqualify its directors. This disqualification of directors involves deactivating their Director Identification Number (DIN), rendering them ineligible for appointment or reappointment as directors for a five-year period.
In 2017, the DINs of all directors marked as inactive by the ROCs due to company director disqualification under Section 164(2) were prohibited from serving as directors in any other company for five years. After the MCA de-flags the company director disqualification of a DIN, a director who has been disqualified under Section 164(2) of the Act is eligible to be re-appointed as a director of a business. The MCA will de-flag the disqualified DIN (Director Identification Number) five years from the date of the company director disqualification.
If someone is disqualified, they cannot become a Director of that company or any other company. This restriction lasts for five years or as required. Since 2017, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has been strictly enforcing these rules of the Companies Act. Recently, the MCA has published the names of the disqualified Directors on the government website.
An order disqualifying a Director does not take effect within 30 days of a conviction resulting in a sentence or order, according to the Companies Act 2013. As a result, anyone who has received an order has 30 days to file returns and appeals in order to stop the proceedings.
Once an appeal is filed, the person will continue to serve as Director for another seven days after the appeal or petition is dismissed. As a result, anyone who has been disqualified as a Director must file an appeal as soon as possible, along with any overdue returns, in order to have a strong chance of continuing to act as a Director.
The Companies Act of 2013 does not include provisions for removing DIN disqualifications. If disqualified, a director can appeal to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and seek a temporary stay order. The disqualification order against a director does not become effective until 30 days after it is issued under the Act.
When a director appeals to the NCLAT, they remain in their position at the defaulting firm for seven days. Directors must file annual returns within seven years to avoid disqualification. There’s no process to reappoint a disqualified director. However, after five years of disqualification, a director can be reappointed.
Directors can appeal to the High Courts to lift their disqualification. However, different High Courts have varying views on whether disqualification under Section 164(2) should be removed. For instance, the High Courts of Gujarat, Karnataka, Madras, and Allahabad have provided specific directives and removed ineligible directors from the ROC lists. In contrast, the Mumbai High Court does not typically lift director disqualifications.
Several company directors moved the High Court/National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”) to have their DINs and companies revived under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution and Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The company must file an application to resuscitate itself in respect to the disqualification of directors under section 252(3) of the Companies Act. This application can also be submitted by a member, creditor, or even a worker. However, disqualified directors are not eligible for re-appointment in the same or any other corporation unless they correct their error.